Another good test for this would be a mail domain "A" record lookup filter:
 
    MAILDOMAIN    25    IS    64.94.110.11
 
That, combined with the hostname "A" record lookup filter below, would take care of this stupid VeriSpam issue.
 
Bill
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 8:32 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] A slight increase in spam not getting caught thanks to Network Solutions

Yep, that should certainly cover all of the bases!  ;-)
 
Actually, what we need is a hostname lookup filter:
 
    HOSTNAME-ADDR    25    IS    64.94.110.11
 
If the hostname resolves to 64.94.110.11, then add lots of weight to the message.
 
Bill
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 7:41 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] A slight increase in spam not getting caught thanks to Network Solutions

I think a better filter might be:

BODY        1000000    CONTAINS verisign
HEADERS        1000000    CONTAINS verisign
HELO        1000000    CONTAINS verisign
MAILFROM    1000000    CONTAINS verisign
REMOTEIP    1000000    CONTAINS verisign
REVDNS        1000000    CONTAINS verisign
ALLRECIPS    1000000    CONTAINS verisign
SUBJECT        1000000    CONTAINS verisign

and don't forget obfuscation...

BODY        1000000    CONTAINS v-e-r-i-s-i-g-n
BODY        1000000    CONTAINS v.e.r.i.s.i.g.n
BODY        1000000    CONTAINS v�risign
BODY        1000000    CONTAINS verlslgn

Matt :)



Bill Landry wrote:
Oops, never mind, that's not going to work.  Hmmm, back to the drawing board
on this one...

Bill
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bill Landry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 7:18 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] A slight increase in spam not getting caught
thanks to Network Solutions


  
For now I've added:

REVDNS 10 ENDSWITH sitefinder-idn.verisign.com

to at least be able to add some weight to e-mail messages that use bogus
domain names and resolve RDNS for 64.94.110.11 to
sitefinder-idn.verisign.com.

Bill
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "R. Scott Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 4:32 PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] A slight increase in spam not getting caught
thanks to Network Solutions


    
Just so people are aware, Network Solutions just hours ago made the dumb
move of making all unregistered domains point to their web site.  As a
result, very little E-mail will fail the MAILFROM test in Declude
      
JunkMail
  
(only E-mail from addresses on recently expired domains, and domains not
handled by Network Solutions will still fail).  Fortunately, the
      
MAILFROM
  
test only caught about 2% of all spam, but it was an extremely reliable
      
test.
    
                                                    -Scott
      

Reply via email to