|
It's a limitation in the filtering capabilities. I certainly don't
want to do that, but there is no way around it. You just have to keep
that in mind when scanning the headers after seeing this test tripped. The way you had it written, it would be tripped just as often, but it would have credited 7 points to spam that spoofed the Mozilla header and didn't spoof your domain. That would of course not be a good idea. Matt John Tolmachoff (Lists) wrote:
|
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Another very effective fi... Matthew Bramble
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Another very effecti... Matthew Bramble
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Another very eff... John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Another very... R. Scott Perry
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Another very... John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Another very... R. Scott Perry
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Another very... Matthew Bramble
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Another very... Bill Landry
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Another very... Matthew Bramble
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Another very effecti... John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Another very eff... Matthew Bramble
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Another very effecti... John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Another very eff... Matthew Bramble
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Another very... Bill Landry
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Another very... John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Another very... Matthew Bramble
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Another very... Bill Landry
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Another very... Karen D. Oland
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Another very... John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Another very... Kevin Bilbee
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Another very... John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
