Is it accurate to say that a filter in DECLUDE Pro using REVDNS is more efficient and runs faster than a filter using BODY?
My standard procedure was to add a BODY filter that contains the domain of a link found in the spam messages that make it through other tests. This makes sure that they will be caught next time. I've noticed though that a surprising number of these domains that are found in the body of the spam are also the reverse DNS of the message sender. Am I better off filtering the REVDNS instead of the BODY? Paul Navarre --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
