> A couple of posters offered some help on this, where I don't > have the original messages (they're at home and I'm at work). > The FP rate is fairly heavy on spamchk so far... including > bagging about half of the traffic on this list today. I'm > sure its something easily fixed.
The best way to fix this is to set the debuglevel to 9 and watch the logfile. Here you can see exactly why spamchk gives certain points based on your ini file. Keep in mind that we consider spamchk not as a simple test but as a group of content based tests that give the determined weight back to declude. So I highly recommend: 1.) use spamchk in a declude weighting system where actions are taken based on determined weights and not on the result of an individual test. 2.) adapt all points in the spamchk.ini-file to your declude weighting system 3.) add your own keywords with a negative weight to your [checkwords] section. (for example: spammers can't know certain local situations like citiy-names and phone prefixes) Keep also in mind that not all parameters in the ini file are points. There are also certain values to configure the number of appearance of certain characters or spam properties. -- Thanks for pointing out a problem with the subscribe link but if I try to use the link on http://www.spamchk.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=2 this seems to work. Can't see any error. Markus --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
