|
Totally agree. I know we'll always be at
their mercy, but at least we would have some warning
then...<grin>
Darin. ----- Original Message -----
From: Todd Holt
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 9:14 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] AOL and Reverse DNS I would agree with this
type of governing body. One that
sets standards like RDNS entries and what they mean. < pessimistic rant> But it is still up to
each mail admin(s) to implement an anti-spam policy. And the history of governing bodies is
such that only the biggest players have a voice. This would probably mean that AOL,
Earthlink, RR, Hotmail, etc would be on the governing council�and it would be
interpreted to their greatest competitive advantage�and nothing would have
changed! </pessimistic
rant>
-----Original
Message----- This is exactly why I think we
should have a some sort of global internet council for setting standards, rather
than all of us little guys having to react, after the fact, whenever a large
player makes a change. The global council could maintain a distribution
list to help mail admins to keep up with proposed changes and implementation
schedules. This is very similar to any other industry that must keep up
with compliance standards. In some ways this also seems like an
unfair competition tactic as it makes the little guys look bad when
our customers can't send mail to AOL...it encourages customers to move to the
large players to avoid not having mail delivered to their
users.
----- Original Message -----
From: Todd Holt
Sent:
Subject: RE:
[Declude.JunkMail] AOL and Reverse DNS I know this will stir a
few people the wrong way, but� If so many people are
upset that MS is being monopolistic by using their EULA to prevent software from
operating, then why don�t those same people get upset at AOL for the
internet-nazi-police tactics used to prevent mail from being
delivered? MS just says that you
can�t use certain apps on their OS.
AOL says that you can�t deliver mail through mail servers (that control
more email than any other on the planet) because they deemed it �bad� through
inaccurate, generalized and dare I say �monopolistic�
policies. The lack of complaints
about AOL just shows that the MS bashers are not upset about the MS policies (or
monopoly), they just want to complain about the big company on the block. I think if the majority owner of AOL was
the richest person on the planet, they would bash AOL. How short
sided!!! Further, all of the
justice dept. proceedings are based on complaints by the competition, not the
users. On the other hand, AOL has
thousands of consumer complaints, but very few (if any) complaints by
competitors. It�s obvious that the
justice dept. just wants to appease whiny losers like Jim Barksdale and Scott
McNealy. And the MS bashers just
fall in line.
Lemmings. Todd Holt -----Original
Message----- Hi, I just noticed that AOL has stepped
up their policies another notch. They used to say that "AOL
**MAY**" not accept email from servers without Reverse DNS.
In the last two weeks, that
changed:
Best
Regards |
Title: Message
- [Declude.JunkMail] AOL and Reverse DNS Andy Schmidt
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] AOL and Reverse DNS Todd Holt
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] AOL and Reverse DNS Hosting Support
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] AOL and Reverse DNS Todd Holt
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] AOL and Reverse... Hosting Support
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] AOL and Reverse... Pete McNeil
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] AOL and Re... Hosting Support
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] AOL an... Pete McNeil
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] AO... Hosting Support
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] AO... Kevin Bilbee
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] AO... Hosting Support
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] AOL and Re... Burzin Sumariwalla
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] AOL and Reverse DNS Kevin Bilbee
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] AOL and Reverse DNS DLAnalyzer Support
