UPDATE:

>From a response I received from Ipswitch a bit ago:

"I think 8.05 might have addressed this...how about upgrading and letting me
know"

John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You


> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff (Lists)
> Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 6:55 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude not taking action
> 
> FYI, I have a support incident open with Ipswitch on this issue and have
> passed on others information posted here. Here is there response this
> morning:
> 
> "John, We're looking into it a bit further, I've passed the info to R&D
> for
> some further insight.  Thanks for your patience."
> 
> John Tolmachoff
> Engineer/Consultant/Owner
> eServices For You
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
> > Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 5:03 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude not taking action
> >
> >
> > >- In our configuration we do all the IP4r tests in IMail and add header
> > for
> > >Declude to analyze.  It is as if IMail never added the headers.. Since
> > none
> > >are there.  Could it be that IMail somehow skips its own spam test?
> > Should
> > >we not expect if IMail has done all that it was to do the headers from
> > its
> > >spam test would show up?  Why are they absent?
> >
> > It sounds like the bug is hitting IMail, too.  I'd actually call that a
> > double-bug, if it is really true.
> >
> > The problem here seems to be that IMail's SMTPD process is unlocking the
> > E-mail, but then leaving it unlocked while it runs the spam tests!
> That's
> > the first bug -- it is supposed to lock the file.  The next bug is the
> > even
> > more serious one, that allows the queue manager to send out E-mail that
> > hasn't been fully processed yet.
> >
> > >May be if we try to present the common factors of the ones that are
> being
> > >skipped we can find what is causing it.  I know for sure we are getting
> > 5+ a
> > >day..
> >
> > It looks like you've found the common factor.
> >
> > We're going to do some testing here, but for some reason the IMail v8
> > anti-spam on our test server doesn't seem to be working.
> >
> >                                                     -Scott
> > ---
> > Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers.
> > Declude Virus: Catches known viruses and is the leader in mailserver
> > vulnerability detection.
> > Find out what you've been missing: Ask about our free 30-day evaluation.
> >
> > ---
> > [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
> > (http://www.declude.com)]
> >
> > ---
> > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
> > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
> > type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
> > at http://www.mail-archive.com.
> 
> ---
> [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
> (http://www.declude.com)]
> 
> ---
> This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
> unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
> type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
> at http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

Reply via email to