John, for what it's worth, I find that CBL and selective SORBS tests are much more reliable since I renamed them to include "DYNA" in their test name, resulting in my giving them higher weights.
Much of what gets get caught that way are the zombies on broadband networks. Matt's DYNAMIC test definitely helps too. Now, if the major players would get on with implementing SPF, we could go to town on REVDNS blocking AT&T, ComCast, Rogers, Shaw, Verizon and Videotron zombies on these broadband networks! Andrew 8) -----Original Message----- From: John Tolmachoff (Lists) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2003 11:02 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Test Suggestion It would be great with the current options available in Declude is some one could come up with a test to see if the message came from only one hope, meaning directly from the generation source, as opposed to from a user, through their mail server, then to yours. You would exclude your user IP ranges using the END statement, as well as END for web server generated auto mailings. This would help catch all this spam from zombies. John Tolmachoff Engineer/Consultant/Owner eServices For You --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
