[Declude.JunkMail] How did this get through

[Darin Cox]

Hi Scott,   This is interesting.  It slipped through my filtering since we prepend the Subject with "SPAM[" and filter client-side to ensure delivery of all valid email.  However, with this one there's no Subject line to prepend to.   What about a stronger test than BADHEADERS like REALLYBADHEADERS <grin> that might be acceptable to delete on?   Thoughts?   Received: from paluch3-ip09.ip.poda.cz [82.209.11.202] by www2.vwc.net   (SMTPD32-8.01) id A6B73D2036E; Sat, 24 Jan 2004 08:44:23 -0500 Received: from 158.209.220.224 by 82.209.11.202; Fri, 23 Jan 2004 16:47:41 +0300 Message-ID: <H[20 X-RBL-Warning: CBL: Blocked - see http://cbl.abuseat.org/lookup.cgi?ip=82.209.11.202 X-RBL-Warning: DSBL: http://dsbl.org/listing?ip=82.209.11.202 X-RBL-Warning: SPAMCOP: Blocked - see http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?82.209.11.202 X-RBL-Warning: NOABUSE: Not supporting [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-RBL-Warning: NOPOSTMASTER: Not supporting [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-RBL-Warning: BADHEADERS: This E-mail was sent from a broken mail client [8c210000]. X-RBL-Warning: WEIGHT10: Weight of 39 reaches or exceeds the limit of 10. X-Declude-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [82.209.11.202] X-Declude-Spoolname: D76b703d2036e1a63.SMD X-Note: This E-mail was spam-tested by 4C Web (www.4cweb.com). X-Note: This E-mail was sent from paluch3-ip09.ip.poda.cz ([82.209.11.202]). X-Spam-Tests-Failed: CBL, DSBL, SPAMCOP, NOABUSE, NOPOSTMASTER, BADHEADERS, IPNOTINMX, NOLEGITCONTENT, WEIGHT10, WEIGHT15 X-Note: This E-mail was sent from paluch3-ip09.ip.poda.cz ([82.209.11.202]). From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2004 08:44:26 -0500 X-RCPT-TO: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Status: U X-UIDL: 355597629 Darin.