Hi John, We don't hold or delete. We don't hold to reduce management costs, and we haven't previously believed in deleting since we didn't want to take a chance on deleting an FP. So far we've gotten good results with our weighting with >95% marked and no FPs, but we have a small statistical pool so our config might not work as well for others. You make a good point, though, and we may consider deleting at high weights.
However, we might consider deleting something that was badly broken. I don't know of any mail client or component that would send without a Subject line. This may be a one-off and not worth a separate test, though. Has anyone else seen this? Darin. ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Tolmachoff (Lists)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, January 24, 2004 10:36 AM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] How did this get through What is your HOLD or DELETE weights? That would have been deleted on my servers. It has a weight of 39. John Tolmachoff Engineer/Consultant/Owner eServices For You -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox Sent: Saturday, January 24, 2004 7:29 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] How did this get through Hi Scott, This is interesting. It slipped through my filtering since we prepend the Subject with "SPAM[" and filter client-side to ensure delivery of all valid email. However, with this one there's no Subject line to prepend to. What about a stronger test than BADHEADERS like REALLYBADHEADERS <grin> that might be acceptable to delete on? Thoughts? Received: from paluch3-ip09.ip.poda.cz [82.209.11.202] by www2.vwc.net (SMTPD32-8.01) id A6B73D2036E; Sat, 24 Jan 2004 08:44:23 -0500 Received: from 158.209.220.224 by 82.209.11.202; Fri, 23 Jan 2004 16:47:41 +0300 Message-ID: <H[20 X-RBL-Warning: CBL: Blocked - see http://cbl.abuseat.org/lookup.cgi?ip=82.209.11.202 X-RBL-Warning: DSBL: http://dsbl.org/listing?ip=82.209.11.202 X-RBL-Warning: SPAMCOP: Blocked - see http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?82.209.11.202 X-RBL-Warning: NOABUSE: Not supporting [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-RBL-Warning: NOPOSTMASTER: Not supporting [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-RBL-Warning: BADHEADERS: This E-mail was sent from a broken mail client [8c210000]. X-RBL-Warning: WEIGHT10: Weight of 39 reaches or exceeds the limit of 10. X-Declude-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [82.209.11.202] X-Declude-Spoolname: D76b703d2036e1a63.SMD X-Note: This E-mail was spam-tested by 4C Web (www.4cweb.com). X-Note: This E-mail was sent from paluch3-ip09.ip.poda.cz ([82.209.11.202]). X-Spam-Tests-Failed: CBL, DSBL, SPAMCOP, NOABUSE, NOPOSTMASTER, BADHEADERS, IPNOTINMX, NOLEGITCONTENT, WEIGHT10, WEIGHT15 X-Note: This E-mail was sent from paluch3-ip09.ip.poda.cz ([82.209.11.202]). From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2004 08:44:26 -0500 X-RCPT-TO: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Status: U X-UIDL: 355597629 Darin. --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. _____________________________________ [This E-mail virus scanned by 4C Web] --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
