Scott,
I'm on 1.75, with LogLevel MID.
In parsing the JM log, I noticed the oddity
below
02/27/2004 00:03:26 Qcf9a013b030eb667 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] IP: 141.158.231.134 ID:
061A40A1F2
02/27/2004 00:03:26 Qcf9d01b00336bec4
nNOLEGITCONTENT:-3 . Total weight = -3
02/27/2004 00:03:26 Qcf9d01b00336bec4 R1 Message OK 02/27/2004 00:03:58 Qcfba00c803103145 AHBL:6 SBL:7 SORBS-SPAM:9 SPAMCOP:9 nIPNOTINMX:-3 . Total weight = 28 Notice the middle two lines for queuename
Qcf9d01b00336bec4... There is no From/To line for this queuename... I
checked the whole logfile.
Is this by design because the message ended up with
a negative weight? Is there any way we can guarantee that a From/To
line will always exist?
The reason I ask is that we're setting up some
reports on how many emails pass/fail by domain for JM. It would be really
nice to be able to use the JM logfile solely as opposed to having to parse the
IMail logfile to get the recipient domain for this email.
Darin.
|
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Possible Missing JM Log lines in 1.7... Darin Cox
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Possible Missing JM Log lines i... R. Scott Perry
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Possible Missing JM Log lin... Darin Cox
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Possible Missing JM Log... R. Scott Perry
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Possible Missing JM... Darin Cox
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Possible Missi... Darin Cox
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Possible M... R. Scott Perry
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Possib... Darin Cox
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Possible Missing JM... Matt
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Possible Missi... R. Scott Perry
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Possible Missing JM... Bill Landry