Good work, but far too large even if processing "only" 10000 message/day. CPU (P4 2,8 GHz) usage goes up to 100% after enabling this tests on our server.
After running this test for some minutes I can see that the small SURBL filter seems to be more effective then the large filter files. SURBL has catched 23 spams (4 without a result from the two other tests) BESURBL has catched 5 spams (1 without a result from the two other tests) SASURBL has catched 21 spams (2 without a result from the two other tests) SURBL actually is 17 kb in size. BESURBL actually is 208 kb in size. SASURBL actually is 339 kb in size. Have a nice weekend. Markus > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Fisher > Sent: Friday, April 23, 2004 5:47 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Assassin SURBL batch file > > I have taken Roger Eriksson's SURBL batch file and using the > magic of copy and paste have altered it to use the Spam > Assassin SURBL. > > This list is much larger than the Spamcop SURBL so your > performance may suffer. > > Attached renamed exclusion file and the cmd file. > You'll need to rename the sasurbl_filter.txt back to > sasurbl_filter.cmd. > You'll also need the wget.exe and the todos.exe from Roger's > original SURBL. See: > http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg17870.html > > > > > > > --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
