This is a common occurrence with dynamic IPs. Some spammer sends while he has it or it's an open proxy, then someone else gets the IP and is penalized for the previous activity.
I think what you're suggesting is that there needs to be some sort of age-out mechanism for blocks against dynamic IPs, to remove them from open proxy or spam blocks after a certain time if no further activity is recorded. Can't be perfect, but might help of BLs implemented it. Obviously the IP would remain in DYNABLOCK. Darin. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dave Doherty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, May 01, 2004 12:13 AM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] NJABL:NJABL Open Relay / Dynamic IP Conflict Hi, all- I have a cable modem in my apartment with a dynamic IP. I sent a couple of emails tonight to others at my domain. These messages FP'd. They were caught by NJABL, which has my current address listed as an open proxy, with a listing date in January. This address is also listed (correctly) in DYNABLOCK. But if it's a dynamic address, the IP of whatever open proxy existed in January has certainly changed. Does anyone else see the illogic in NJABL's lists, or am I crazy? Anyway, I am adjusting the weights of the NJABL tests so that no combination can result in a hold weight. -DaveDoherty Skywaves, Inc. --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
