|
A 200 MB normal IMail log file (not set to verbose or debug) would
correspond to more than 200,000 messages on my system. I don't log
POP3 stuff though, so that might also explain the difference. Please zip up yesterday's Declude JunkMail log and post it to a Web site somewhere and send me the link off-list and I will stats on it to determine how many messages that Declude processed. I'm still suspecting volume might be the issue, and it is generally the most likely culprit and deserves extra attention. It could be that you have a customer bulk-mailing through your server. People get a copy of Microsoft Office these days and set up their own newsletters using their provider's SMTP server. I don't believe that 60% fragmentation would cause a significant slowdown, though you would get slightly better performance when defraged, so do that regularly and as soon as it makes sense. Just to keep one step ahead, why don't you indicate which virus scanners you are running (with versions) and confirm your settings in Declude Virus for "PRESCAN" being ON or OFF. Matt Joshua M. Hughes wrote: John, It took me a while to get these stats. I reviewed the SMTP logs for 12/4, 12/5, 12/7, & 12/8. I know the server was running fine during this week. Usage is as follows.12/4 - 83,170 messages 12/5 - 82,065 messages 12/7 - 95,087 messages 12/8 - 95,730 messages I reviewed the SMTP logs for the 1/2, 1/3, & 1/4. These are current and usage is as follows. 1/1 - 59,717 messages 1/2 - 63,795 messages 1/3 - 78,945 messages 1/4 - 79,410 messages It appears as if the beginning of last month, when we were running fine, had a lot more messages being delivered. The only things I see in the log disturbing for today are: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 4.63.108.6 = 1130 messages <> = 1068 messages I have an ipfile that I have set to automatically delete anything from the ip 4.63.108.6 because they have been the top sender of the log for three days. However, this messages is still being processed. Matt, Average SMTP log size is between 102MB to 200MB. This appears normal. The drive that the logs were on wasn't severely fragmented however, I de-fragmented it anyway. The drive that the spool directory is on is 86% free but about 60% fragmented. This drive could be de-fragmented however, I'm worried about de-fragmenting while the CPU is at 100%. Thank you, Joshua Sunline Team (941) 206-7870 http://www.sunline.net/ -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff (Lists) Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2005 12:17 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 2005 SpamHeaders - Fix The CPU spike is probably do to sheer volume. What is the current volume of messages being processed? John Tolmachoff Engineer/Consultant/Owner eServices For You-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Joshua M. Hughes Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2005 8:22 AM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 2005 SpamHeaders - Fix I have not upgraded to fix the 2005 spamheaders test as of yet. Our CPUhas -- ===================================================== MailPure custom filters for Declude JunkMail Pro. http://www.mailpure.com/software/ ===================================================== |
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] 2005 SpamHeaders - Fix - Matt
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] 2005 SpamHeaders - Fix - Dave Doherty
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 2005 SpamHeaders - Fix - marc catuogno
