Correct.  What I was saying I disagreed with was the concept that it only
occurred on struggling servers.  This test machine was very lightly loaded
and we saw log corruption.

Darin.


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Pete McNeil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Darin Cox" <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 7:30 PM
Subject: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Log Corruption


On Tuesday, March 1, 2005, 7:14:31 PM, Darin wrote:

DC> I disagree with the struggling server logic.  We saw the log corruption
in a
DC> test environment a year ago that had minimal traffic, say a couple
thousand
DC> messages a day.  It was a dual 1.4GHz processor with 1 GB RAM and 10k
RPM
DC> SCSI drives.  Load was only about 1-5% during testing.

Heavier loads will cause more processes to "collide" and so log
corruption is likely to be more pronounced in those situations.

_M



---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

Reply via email to