|
Hi Kim, Kim Premuda wrote: Ahh - I did not know that. Thanks!!I experienced the maxed out processor(s) - I only tried it for a few min and then went back to 2.0.16. Haven't tried it since! I am still holding off though on this Beta - I just do not see it as trustworthy and Declude is not forthcoming with its bugs. For example I just saw some posts about issues w/multiprocessor environments - which is scary because that is what I have, you have just uncovered another bug, etc. I had no problem running beta's in Scott's era but now even though I'm sure Declude is trying their best I think it is prudent to be more skeptical.Caution...we attempted to run 3.0.3.7 yesterday and had to revert back to 3.0.3, because 3.0.3.7 would not run more than a minute or two before the 'decludeproc.exe' service stopped. You may or may not have the same results. Hopefully someday they will post known issues.Declude has been notified of this problem. -Nick Kim -- Kim W. Premuda FastWave Internet Services San Diego, CA -- --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. |
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 3.0.3 update Nick Hayer
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 3.0.3 upd... Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 3.0.3... Heimir Eidskrem
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 3... Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declu... Heimir Eidskrem
