We are all listening
 
Barry


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Colbeck, Andrew
Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2005 2:14 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: another SOBERing though

It certainly does feel like deja vu all over again!
 
Remember back in the old days when spammers meant bad guys who bought valid AOL accounts and then threw them away after a spam run?
 
To turn the topic to the other side, blocking incoming spam, if AUTH based spamming becomes common, RBL usage will drop off in importance, and we'll need to emphasize content scanning, and tracking inbound mail volumes from a given valid account from a given valid ISP.
 
It's nice to see that David Barker is listening, as he may see that robust MIME decoding is in Declude's future:
 
- at the minimum to assist the filter text files in the Pro version
- at the minimum to avoid the false positives and wasted CPU in scanning binary attachments for spam text
- to add features common to all current antispam solutions, e.g. SURBL
- to make the various layers of decoding available to external tests to make them better and avoid duplication of efforts
- probably a dozen other things that aren't on the tip of my tongue
 
Andrew 8)
 


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Markus Gufler
Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2005 10:37 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: another SOBERing though

Wow!
It's like 1995 - 2005 had never been. :-|
 
ok, I must say I never worked with Declude Hijack. It's not simply this what we need now?
 
Markus
 


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Colbeck, Andrew
Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2005 6:41 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: another SOBERing though

You can read about or get your own version of the password stealing app here:
 
 
Andrew 8)
 
 

Reply via email to