|
Karl, the correct format is as below:
SPFPASS spf pass x 0 0
SPFFAIL spf fail x 5 0 Note that nobody uses SPFPASS to grant a negative
weight to an incoming message. This is because a certain family of the bad
guys definitely use SPF and their own mail servers, and we don't want to
help them.
The best practice is to score a positive weight for a hit
on SPFFAIL, ignore SPFUNKNOWN, and not grant a negative weight on
SPFPASS.
If you want to go the extra mile, use SPFPASS as a
test in a JunkMail Pro filter file in combination with other
tests.
Idea 1) Use it with TESTSFAILED to stop processing early
in a filter file that checks for zombie spam to mitigate false
positives.
Idea 2) Use it with a filter file that already awards
negative points to your important business partners to award extra negative
weight so as to mitigate false positives (e.g. to counterbalance a sudden
listing of their IP address in SpamCop).
Andrew 8)
|
- [Declude.JunkMail] SPF PASS/FAIL test fo... IS - Systems Eng. \(Karl Drugge\)
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF PASS/FAI... Scott Fisher
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF PASS... Kevin Bilbee
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF PASS... John Doyle
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF ... David Barker
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF PASS/FAI... Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF PASS/FAI... Colbeck, Andrew
