>>Does 8.22 require 3.0 or can I run my 2.x version?
 
Imail 8.20+ requires Declude 3.0 or later.
 
David B


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Doyle
Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2005 2:16 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF PASS/FAIL test format

I have quick question re. 3.0 version of Declude.
I installed both the .20 and the .21 version on a windows 2003 enterprise server with Imail 8.15 hf2 and discovered a memory leak.
I've not heard back from Declude as to a fix.
 
I'd like to go to 8.22 to address a few issues but am worried about 3.0.5.21 having the memory leak. I can only run about 2 to 4
hours before we seem to lose the ability to access dns. and run low on memory.
 
Does 8.22 require 3.0 or can I run my 2.x version?
 
Does anyone have any experiance with this and would share any thoughts.
 
thanks
 
John
 
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Scott Fisher
Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2005 10:55 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF PASS/FAIL test format

Also make sure you have at least version 3.0.5.20
 
Previous 3.0.5. versions had an error with SPF
 
---- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2005 12:08 PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF PASS/FAIL test format

Quick question on the global.cfg file…

 

I upgraded to 3.0.5 yesterday. Working great so far. I want to add the SPFPASS and SPFFAIL tests.. what is the format ? I want to subtract 7 points for a pass, and add 7 points for a fail…( if they’re too stupid to have an SPF by now… )

 

I have this, but it is obviously wrong…

 

SPFFAIL           spffail           x     x     7     0

SPFPASS           spfpass           x     x     -7    0

 

 

Karl Drugge
B.S.I.T., A.S., M.C.S.E. ( NT 4.0 + 2000 ), C.C.N.A., C.C.D.A., Network+, A+
I dream of the day when I will learn to stop asking questions to which I will regret learning the answers ( Roy Greenhilt, Order of the Stick  ) 

 

PLEASE NOTE : Florida has a very broad public records law. Most written communications to or from City officials regarding City business are public records available to the public and media upon request. Your E-mail communications may be subject to public disclosure.

Reply via email to