|
Sandy, I don't want to have a flame war here, but I do want to encourage discussions that are beneficial to both myself and the community at large. The Declude list is frequented by many non-Declude users for the very reason that it isn't just simply a support group for a product (even if it was originally designed to be that), it has instead become a forum for exchanging valuable information, sometimes even reaching beyond spam and virus prevention. I am the person that brought up Alligate, and I did so in response to someone asking me what I am using for a gateway. I also of course mentioned VamSOFT's ORF, which market's itself as a full fledged anti-spam gateway (but falls far short to Declude). In fact, you were the person that lead me to ORF, and that was on this list: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg16032.html I am very thankful that you did that because I had to have a solution, and I have shared information and scripts with others to be used with ORF, and made several other converts. Likewise, I wouldn't be staying true to the community spirit if I didn't divulge my appreciation for what Alligate does, and how it is a much better alternative for those of us that absolutely must have an address validating and pre-scanning gateway. In the same light, Declude also competes with IMail's own offering, and Declude definitely favors the SmarterMail implementation due to their much tighter relationship with SmarterTools, yet there is plenty of discussion on the IMail list of Declude, and such discussions have never been banned. Alligate also is the company that publishes the MXRate IP4R test that was most recently discussed last week, and I am aware that Brian and Barry are friendly and have talked occasionally over the past couple of years. The Alligate Gateway is competitively priced, and designed exclusively as an enhancement to products like IMail/SmarterMail with Declude. While there are other such solutions out there, nothing lays a hand on it's functionality, and there are some very nice things in beta that will propel it even farther forward. For Erik, who asked the question that prompted my reply, the latest Alligate Gateway will definitely solve almost all of his issues with malformed spam since it is zombie generated, and the gateway's greylisting support will block pretty much all zombie spam, and regardless of whether or not it normalizes the malformed headers. From the sounds of things, Declude is going to need some time to rewrite the code that processes the headers, which would be welcomed, but not necessarily timely enough for some in light of current circumstances. If conversations like this are beaten down or censored, this list will cease to be a free (mostly) exchange of expert ideas and opinions, and in turn it will become nothing more than a support list with newbs asking the same questions over and over and over again, and instead of us answering the questions, that would mostly be left to Declude to answer (like the SmarterMail forum) as the experts seek open forums in which to discuss what we do here. I'm not saying that your opinions are without any merit, but they, like mine, are just opinions, and I hope that we all continue to share them. I have no doubt that you will disagree with some of this, but let's just agree to disagree and spare the list from less productive discussions. Matt Sanford Whiteman wrote:
|
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] [139-0B9B7BC7-18FF] Declude not in... Erik
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] [139-0B9B7BC7-18FF] Declude n... Matt
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] [139-0B9B7BC7-18FF] Declu... Ncl Admin
- Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] [139-0B9B7BC7-18FF... Sanford Whiteman
- Re: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] [139-0B9B7... Ncl Admin
- Re[4]: [Declude.JunkMail] [139-0B9B... Sanford Whiteman
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] [139-0B9... Matt
- Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] [... Sanford Whiteman
- RE: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] [139-0B9B7... Craig Edmonds
- Re[4]: [Declude.JunkMail] [139-0B9B... Sanford Whiteman
