Title: Message
|
Thanks
Matt,
Please
keep us posted on our results ("us" meaning those that not running the the
latest 3.0.XX or 4.XX.XX release of Declude). I've mentioned this before;
Delculde will not support us for the 2.XX.XX version we run; even though we have
current service agreement). So your results will matter at least to us as
I said before, I think your servers and ours run about the the same amount of
inbound emails.
I'm
not sure, but I think you mentioned once to either me directly or to the list
that your servers are setup as a gateway? Ours are not. Our Declude
and Imail are on the same server.
Thanks,
-Erik
Eric and Greg,
I'm basing the compatibility
thing on reports to this list, and those reports prompted Declude to change
it's architecture for processing messages. Something clearly was
happening, but I don't recall ever hearing exactly what the cause was. I
haven't tried 2.0.6.16 with IMail 8.22 myself yet, but I'm considering falling
back.
Matt
Erik wrote:
Thanks Matt.
We
are running Imail 8.22 (2005.10.19.3) and Declude version 2.06.16 on a
Windows 2000 Sever version 5.00.2195 Service Pack 4 with will no issues
other then the ones I submitted to Declude for support and what I've
mentioned on this list (which they "declude" will not not provide us support
on since we do not run their "current" version)... but the problem even
exists in their "current" version according to the lists of others
postings. So unfortunately, Declude will not provide us support
(even though we are a paid customer of their product) based on the version
we run.
So
I'd be interested to know on our your servers run the latest 3.0X version of
Declude.
Thanks!
-Erik
Erik,
Honestly, I was between a rock and a
hard place. Declude 2.x doesn't work with IMail 8.2+, and IMail
8.15- has issues with killer messages that crash the Queue Manager service
(which I found out the hard way, and 8.21 apparently fixes). For a
while the killer messages were somewhat common, and all it took was one
leaking through Declude to crash the services, and then you had to dig it
out of the spool.
So to keep my Queue Manager stable, I had to make
the leap.
I'll follow up with some comments about my
experience.
Matt
Erik wrote:
LOL, had to laugh at Nick. I'll wait to hear from Matt
after his upgrade before we attempt to do it again. I think Matt's
and our servers handle about the same email volume.
-Erik
Hi Matt,
Matt wrote:
I'm
trying an upgrade from the 2.x release for the first time,
Why on earth would you want to do that? Was 2x too bug
free and you need some
excitement?
-Nick
|
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] What happened to the logging since 2.x????, it... Erik
-
