I get good hits from both lists with invURIBL. uribl.com is more
aggressive (IMO) than surbl.
I query SURBL first and than uribl second. Even with that config (and
skip weights set) I still get more hits on URIBL.
F:\Logs\invURIBL>grep -i "message body found in multi.uribl.com"
uribl-logfile1017.txt | wc -l
2030
F:\Logs\invURIBL>grep -i "message body found in multi.surbl.org"
uribl-logfile1017.txt | wc -l
1328
Check your test points for URIBL.com. They have been know to block dns
serves that have high query rates since they now offer a data feed service.
Darrell
--
----------------------------------
Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude,
Imail, mxGuard, and ORF. IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring,
SURBL/URI integration, MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers.
Andy Schmidt wrote:
Hi,
I checked two of my systems and noticed that apparently multi.uribl.com does
not have any hits for its black and red lists EVER? I find that hard to
believe.
My systems DOES check SURBL first, and only would pass a good message to
URIBL. Is it really possible that URIBL is fully redundant to SURBL (I would
have expected SOME overlap, but not 100%).
Does anyone have any experience with multi.uribl.com?
Best Regards,
Andy
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
