> It's a right pain to have to handle this as a special case > (using SP's etc to solve). Maybe this points towards the real problem, that SPs are perceived to be a pain? We use Visual Studio to edit and debug stored procedures on a SQL Server 7 database and it is very simple, with code highlighting, and tooltip-style variable inspection. I have heard the argument that all updates to a database should be done through stored procedures to easily ensure consistency (for a complex operation) and enhance security as users no longer need permissions to update tables directly. Paul Ritchie Radio Computing Services. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- New Zealand Delphi Users group - Delphi List - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Website: http://www.delphi.org.nz To UnSub, send email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] with body of "unsubscribe delphi"
- Re: [DUG]: embedded database. Steve Peacocke
- Re: [DUG]: embedded database. Ian Fear
- RE: [DUG]: embedded database. Patrick Dunford
- RE: [DUG]: embedded database. Gary T. Benner
- Re: [DUG]: embedded database. Matthew Comb
- Re: [DUG]: embedded database. Xander van der Merwe
- Re: [DUG]: embedded database. Neven MacEwan
- RE: [DUG]: embedded database. Myles Penlington
- Re: [DUG]: embedded database. Neven MacEwan
- RE: [DUG]: embedded database. Myles Penlington
- Re: [DUG]: embedded database. Paul Ritchie
- Re: [DUG]: embedded database. David Brennan
- Re: [DUG]: embedded database. Neven MacEwan
- Re: [DUG]: embedded database. David Brennan
- Re: [DUG]: embedded database. Neven MacEwan
- RE: [DUG]: embedded database. Paul Ritchie
- Re: [DUG]: embedded database. David Brennan
- RE: [DUG]: embedded database. Paul Ritchie
- RE: [DUG]: embedded database. Paul Ritchie
- Re: [DUG]: embedded database. Neven MacEwan
- RE: [DUG]: embedded database. Paul Ritchie