I agree with you about a long time for VB6 code to disappear, but that
is completely separate from VB.NET code.

I credit even feeble-minded VB developers with the vision to generally
not even think about porting VB6 code to VB.NET (if not, I don't want to
know them on a professional basis).  Apart from the name, it's a
completely different beast.

I don't believe there will be wholescale porting of VB6 code to .NET,
therefore I strongly believe you will find way more than single-digit C#
development being undertaken.

I don't believe VB developers are blindly going to just use VB.NET
without at least some of them opening their eyes to the possibility of
another .NET language.

C.

-----Original Message-----
From: Neven MacEwan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

> I find that statement a bit hard to believe.
Why? 

> What do you base that on? 
Based on the fact that there are several million VB programmers out
there and billions of lines of VB code, It will take a long time for
that to get out of the system (see recent threads about COBOL &
FORTRAN). The logical jump is a/ We have a VB App b/ Lets port it to
VB.net 'cause Bill told us too c/ Hey there this thing called
Middleware..we can make our app n+ tier, the Marketing guys said its
good d/ I can write this in VB too! 

----- Original Message -----
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2004 11:28 AM
Subject: RE: [DUG] [OFF-TOPIC] Delphi 8 and .net

> I don't think it's necessarily going to be Delphi.NET, but I'd have
> thought C# would account for way more than single digits.  Oh yeah,
that
> and Cobol.NET...
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> C.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Neven MacEwan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> 
> Also don't forget that 90% of .net code will probably end up being
> written in VB

_______________________________________________
Delphi mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://ns3.123.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/delphi

Reply via email to