Why can't Borland do it like MySQL? MySQL is really successful IMHO. Regards Leigh www.smootharm.com
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of James Sugrue Sent: Thursday, 10 August 2006 12:04 p.m. To: 'NZ Borland Developers Group - Delphi List' Subject: RE: [DUG] Turbo Delphi >IMO, Kylix mostly failed because of the way Borland did it. See my >previous posting on this matter: > >http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg00867.html > >Borland was in prime position to be the cross-platform tool vendor of >choice, but unfortunately the opportunity was missed. > >Cheers, >Paul It's fairly easy to blame Borland for the Kylix implementation five years after the fact. A lot has happened in the Linux world since then. I agree that Kylix 1.0 was fairly bad, but I think the biggest problem with Kylix was when it was released. At the time of release most Linux developers (probably still are I guess) were complete zealots and used GCC and Emacs and would never have paid for an IDE. I take your point about the write once for any platform. I think even today if Kylix did that, how big a market is there? I still think Linux is way over hyped, particularly on the Business Desktop. _______________________________________________ Delphi mailing list [email protected] http://ns3.123.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/delphi _______________________________________________ Delphi mailing list [email protected] http://ns3.123.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/delphi
