+0.5 e.g. for the name @ActivatedOnProjectStage, if we can also agree on @ActivatedOnExpression for [1].
regards, gerhard [1] http://s.apache.org/MeX 2011/12/19 Gerhard Petracek <[email protected]> > +1 > (we could think about a different name) > > regards, > gerhard > > > > 2011/12/19 Gerhard Petracek <[email protected]> > >> hi @ all, >> >> fyi: please check [1] before you answer. >> >> [2] provides a short introduction as well as the basic usage. >> >> the basic concept: >> via the annotation @ProjectStageActivated it's possible to veto bean >> implementations based on the current project-stage [3]. >> >> please send >> +1, +0 or -1 because... >> for the basic idea as well as the basic concept. >> if there are >basic< objections, please also add them to [4] >> >> regards, >> gerhard >> >> [1] http://markmail.org/message/7yefspfuvtz4jvmp >> [2] >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/EXTCDI/Core+Usage#CoreUsage-@ProjectStageActivated >> [3] http://s.apache.org/5hw >> [4] >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/DeltaSpike/SE+Feature+Ranking >> > >
