hi, christian sent his opinion about the name.
@others: please also send your opinion. thx & regards, gerhard 2011/12/20 Christian Kaltepoth <[email protected]> > +1 for the basic concept > +0 for the annotation name. We could think about an alternative. > > > 2011/12/20 Marius Bogoevici <[email protected]>: > > +1 > > > > On 2011-12-19, at 8:13 AM, Gerhard Petracek wrote: > > > >> hi @ all, > >> > >> fyi: please check [1] before you answer. > >> > >> [2] provides a short introduction as well as the basic usage. > >> > >> the basic concept: > >> via the annotation @ProjectStageActivated it's possible to veto bean > >> implementations based on the current project-stage [3]. > >> > >> please send > >> +1, +0 or -1 because... > >> for the basic idea as well as the basic concept. > >> if there are >basic< objections, please also add them to [4] > >> > >> regards, > >> gerhard > >> > >> [1] http://markmail.org/message/7yefspfuvtz4jvmp > >> [2] > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/EXTCDI/Core+Usage#CoreUsage-@ProjectStageActivated > >> [3] http://s.apache.org/5hw > >> [4] > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/DeltaSpike/SE+Feature+Ranking > > > > > > -- > Christian Kaltepoth > Blog: http://chkal.blogspot.com/ > Twitter: http://twitter.com/chkal >
