+1 for the basic concept +0 for the annotation name. We could think about an alternative.
2011/12/20 Marius Bogoevici <[email protected]>: > +1 > > On 2011-12-19, at 8:13 AM, Gerhard Petracek wrote: > >> hi @ all, >> >> fyi: please check [1] before you answer. >> >> [2] provides a short introduction as well as the basic usage. >> >> the basic concept: >> via the annotation @ProjectStageActivated it's possible to veto bean >> implementations based on the current project-stage [3]. >> >> please send >> +1, +0 or -1 because... >> for the basic idea as well as the basic concept. >> if there are >basic< objections, please also add them to [4] >> >> regards, >> gerhard >> >> [1] http://markmail.org/message/7yefspfuvtz4jvmp >> [2] >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/EXTCDI/Core+Usage#CoreUsage-@ProjectStageActivated >> [3] http://s.apache.org/5hw >> [4] >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/DeltaSpike/SE+Feature+Ranking > -- Christian Kaltepoth Blog: http://chkal.blogspot.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/chkal
