The gtk3 branch does not yet compile. One thing I am stuck in now is the gtksourceview stuff (specifically the string searching stuff).
If you like I can give you ssh access to a system that you can use to build. Jeremiah Sent from my Samsung smartphone on AT&T Richard Shann <[email protected]> wrote: >On Sat, 2011-11-05 at 19:27 +0000, Richard Shann wrote: >> On Thu, 2011-11-03 at 15:55 -0500, Jeremiah Benham wrote: >> > We can release. The gtk3 stuff is not ready yet > >aargh! I was forgetting, this means that the evince stuff will not work >on any reasonably modern distro. Is there anything in problematic still >about the gtk3 port? Can I help? >Also, I should bump the version number of the .denemo file format (well >I need to check, but I think there are incompatibilities) > >Richard > > > > >> . We can put it into the release after this one perhaps. So when shall I >> create branch 0.9.4? Tarball release this sunday? >> Well, I'll try and update the docs this week and then we should >> * copy the new features to the change log >> * create the branch >> * upload the candidate tarball to denemo.org >> * download and test that it is ok >> * final upload to ftp.gnu.org >> We could aim for Sunday 13th November if you prefer a weekend, otherwise >> midweek is generally better for announcements. >> >> Richard >> >> >> > >> > Jeremiah >> > >> > Sent from my Samsung smartphone on AT&T >> > >> > Richard Shann <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > >I have run the same LilyPond version under windows and generated the pdf >> > >http://www.denemo.org/dl31 which displays correctly in evince under >> > >linux and acrord32 under windows. It is also smaller because I have >> > >taken out all the point-and-click links. >> > >I think this is ready to go to press. However, until we make a release, >> > >very few people will be able to make use of the source file :( >> > > >> > >Any enthusiasm for a release? >> > > >> > >Richard >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >On Thu, 2011-11-03 at 18:20 +0000, Richard Shann wrote: >> > >> On Thu, 2011-11-03 at 11:30 -0500, Jeremiah Benham wrote: >> > >> > On 11/03/2011 08:08 AM, Richard Shann wrote: >> > >> > > I have uploaded a final version of the Keyboard Polyphony example. >> > >> > > The >> > >> > > pdf is >> > >> > > http://www.denemo.org/dl29 >> > >> > > >> > >> > > and the source file is >> > >> > > >> > >> > > http://www.denemo.org/dl30 >> > >> > > >> > >> > > this source has an include file, so you may need to run the Dynamic >> > >> > > Directive Refresh command before it will print (it is for the book >> > >> > > titles - re-doing the titles will also work, and nothing is needed >> > >> > > if >> > >> > > you have installed to /usr/local). >> > >> > > >> > >> > > My PDF reader displays the treble clef wrongly, if you also see >> > >> > > this and >> > >> > > have a recent version of LilyPond can you try re-printing it to see >> > >> > > if >> > >> > > this is a bug that has been fixed. It does not show this problem in >> > >> > > 20pt >> > >> > > font size, only 18 pt. >> > >> > >> > >> > The treble cleff's did look fine for me at 18pt using lilypond 2.12.3. >> > >> Which viewer program did you use? I downloaded dl29 onto a windows >> > >> laptop and viewed it in Adobe reader. The treble clef was only slightly >> > >> broken on the right side of the top loop. The same file viewed with >> > >> evince and xpdf (which I think use the same underlying library) filled >> > >> in the top loop of the treble clef in black. >> > >> >> > >> > >> > >> > The pdf that you sent had distorted treble cleff's. What version of >> > >> > lilypond do you have? >> > >> lilypond --version >> > >> GNU LilyPond 2.12.3 >> > >> >> > >> So that is quite strange - you get Denemo to generate a pdf via from >> > >> dl30 and it looks different to dl29, and yet we have the same installed >> > >> LilyPond... Hmm. >> > >> I'll try the LilyPond that is installed on my windows laptop. >> > >> Thanks for the feedback >> > >> Richard >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> > >> > >> > Jeremiah >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > I have included a better epilog in this version, and fixed the final >> > >> > > chords to conform with the traditional appearance. The entire file >> > >> > > is >> > >> > > created without inserting any special purpose LilyPond text, that is >> > >> > > just (now-standard) Denemo commands. >> > >> > > >> > >> > > Richard >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > _______________________________________________ >> > >> > > Denemo-devel mailing list >> > >> > > [email protected] >> > >> > > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > >> > Denemo-devel mailing list >> > >> > [email protected] >> > >> > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> _______________________________________________ >> > >> Denemo-devel mailing list >> > >> [email protected] >> > >> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel >> > > >> > > >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Denemo-devel mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel > > _______________________________________________ Denemo-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel
