On Sun, 2011-11-06 at 08:07 -0600, Jeremiah Benham wrote: > The gtk3 branch does not yet compile. One thing I am stuck in now is the > gtksourceview stuff (specifically the string searching stuff). That is search and replace in the scheme window - well, certainly low priority then :)
> > If you like I can give you ssh access to a system that you can use to build. If it doesn't involve too much effort I could give it a try... Richard > > Jeremiah > > Sent from my Samsung smartphone on AT&T > > Richard Shann <[email protected]> wrote: > > >On Sat, 2011-11-05 at 19:27 +0000, Richard Shann wrote: > >> On Thu, 2011-11-03 at 15:55 -0500, Jeremiah Benham wrote: > >> > We can release. The gtk3 stuff is not ready yet > > > >aargh! I was forgetting, this means that the evince stuff will not work > >on any reasonably modern distro. Is there anything in problematic still > >about the gtk3 port? Can I help? > >Also, I should bump the version number of the .denemo file format (well > >I need to check, but I think there are incompatibilities) > > > >Richard > > > > > > > > > >> . We can put it into the release after this one perhaps. So when shall I > >> create branch 0.9.4? Tarball release this sunday? > >> Well, I'll try and update the docs this week and then we should > >> * copy the new features to the change log > >> * create the branch > >> * upload the candidate tarball to denemo.org > >> * download and test that it is ok > >> * final upload to ftp.gnu.org > >> We could aim for Sunday 13th November if you prefer a weekend, otherwise > >> midweek is generally better for announcements. > >> > >> Richard > >> > >> > >> > > >> > Jeremiah > >> > > >> > Sent from my Samsung smartphone on AT&T > >> > > >> > Richard Shann <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > > >> > >I have run the same LilyPond version under windows and generated the pdf > >> > >http://www.denemo.org/dl31 which displays correctly in evince under > >> > >linux and acrord32 under windows. It is also smaller because I have > >> > >taken out all the point-and-click links. > >> > >I think this is ready to go to press. However, until we make a release, > >> > >very few people will be able to make use of the source file :( > >> > > > >> > >Any enthusiasm for a release? > >> > > > >> > >Richard > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > >On Thu, 2011-11-03 at 18:20 +0000, Richard Shann wrote: > >> > >> On Thu, 2011-11-03 at 11:30 -0500, Jeremiah Benham wrote: > >> > >> > On 11/03/2011 08:08 AM, Richard Shann wrote: > >> > >> > > I have uploaded a final version of the Keyboard Polyphony > >> > >> > > example. The > >> > >> > > pdf is > >> > >> > > http://www.denemo.org/dl29 > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > and the source file is > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > http://www.denemo.org/dl30 > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > this source has an include file, so you may need to run the > >> > >> > > Dynamic > >> > >> > > Directive Refresh command before it will print (it is for the book > >> > >> > > titles - re-doing the titles will also work, and nothing is > >> > >> > > needed if > >> > >> > > you have installed to /usr/local). > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > My PDF reader displays the treble clef wrongly, if you also see > >> > >> > > this and > >> > >> > > have a recent version of LilyPond can you try re-printing it to > >> > >> > > see if > >> > >> > > this is a bug that has been fixed. It does not show this problem > >> > >> > > in 20pt > >> > >> > > font size, only 18 pt. > >> > >> > > >> > >> > The treble cleff's did look fine for me at 18pt using lilypond > >> > >> > 2.12.3. > >> > >> Which viewer program did you use? I downloaded dl29 onto a windows > >> > >> laptop and viewed it in Adobe reader. The treble clef was only > >> > >> slightly > >> > >> broken on the right side of the top loop. The same file viewed with > >> > >> evince and xpdf (which I think use the same underlying library) filled > >> > >> in the top loop of the treble clef in black. > >> > >> > >> > >> > > >> > >> > The pdf that you sent had distorted treble cleff's. What version of > >> > >> > lilypond do you have? > >> > >> lilypond --version > >> > >> GNU LilyPond 2.12.3 > >> > >> > >> > >> So that is quite strange - you get Denemo to generate a pdf via from > >> > >> dl30 and it looks different to dl29, and yet we have the same > >> > >> installed > >> > >> LilyPond... Hmm. > >> > >> I'll try the LilyPond that is installed on my windows laptop. > >> > >> Thanks for the feedback > >> > >> Richard > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > >> > >> > Jeremiah > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > I have included a better epilog in this version, and fixed the > >> > >> > > final > >> > >> > > chords to conform with the traditional appearance. The entire > >> > >> > > file is > >> > >> > > created without inserting any special purpose LilyPond text, that > >> > >> > > is > >> > >> > > just (now-standard) Denemo commands. > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > Richard > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > _______________________________________________ > >> > >> > > Denemo-devel mailing list > >> > >> > > [email protected] > >> > >> > > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > >> > Denemo-devel mailing list > >> > >> > [email protected] > >> > >> > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> > >> Denemo-devel mailing list > >> > >> [email protected] > >> > >> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel > >> > > > >> > > > >> > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Denemo-devel mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel > > > > _______________________________________________ Denemo-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel
