On Wed, 2012-08-08 at 19:35 +0200, Federico Bruni wrote: > Il 08/08/2012 19:09, Richard Shann ha scritto: > > It seems to be a bug in gtk - if I enquire if the cursor is visible it > > says it is. If I put the editor in a top level window, it is becomes > > actually visible. Somewhere in the hierarchy of widgets a signal is > > getting lost I guess. Do you have GTK2 or 3? I am hoping the bug is > > fixed in GTK3. > > > > I think I have both: > > $ aptitude search '~i libgtk' > i A libgtk-3-0 > i A libgtk-3-bin > i A libgtk-3-common > i A libgtk-3-dev > i A libgtk-sharp-beans-cil > i A libgtk-vnc-2.0-0 > i A libgtk2-perl > i A libgtk2.0-0 > i A libgtk2.0-bin > i A libgtk2.0-cil > i A libgtk2.0-common > i A libgtk2.0-dev > i libgtk2.0-doc > You can find out which your Denemo is linked to by a message that is emitted at startup - I get this Gtk version 2.20.1 if you also get 2.xx.xx then perhaps you can rebuild against gtk3 and see if that fixes the cursor bug?
> > >>> > >>> Either: > >>> the score allowed you to quit with the changes not saved, that is you > >>> can change a score layout and the score fails to become unsaved (I think > >>> I fixed all cases of this, please report if not) > >>> Or: > >>> it is opening with the default layout as the selected layout, not the > >>> one you customized. I think my intention was that the last selected > >>> layout should be selected when re-opening a score (so that hitting print > >>> without looking at the score layout view will print the last selected > >>> layout). If not, you have to select this layout - note that when you > >>> re-open a score the custom layout becomes pure LilyPond, the GUI is not > >>> saved. > >>> > >> > >> It's the latter. > > Mmm, are you sure, I was checking this afternoon, and it seemed to load > > a previously saved file with the last used custom layout as the selected > > layout. Perhaps you just meant that you saved while the default layout > > was selected? (Mmm, in fact that is a snag - if you save with layout A > > selected then select layout B print, etc, then quit without saving again > > then on loading it up again, A will print out if you just hit print. > > Well, perhaps that is ok). > > > > You are right. > I had a few problems: three custom layouts. I removed two of them. > I think that the active layout moves to the left in the Score Layout > window. Is it correct? yes, there is some clunky re-positioning goes on :( > > Now Export as PDF uses the custom layout. > > > > >> Now I understand: if you use File>Export as>PDF, the default layout will > >> be automatically used. > > The Export as PDF is old code, it will create large pdfs with point and > > click information in them, unless you turn it off. It should probably be > > re-engineered to work via the current layout and to avoid point and > > click info. > >> If you want to print a customized layout, you must use View>Score > >> layout, choose the custom layout and click Typeset. Then print to PDF. > >> > > As said before, it works also the Export if the custom layout becomes > the default in Score Layout. This is at least my understanding. > > Yes, I confirm the point-and-click. ? the Score->Point and Click (Off/On) menu item? The downside is you lose point and click from the Print View window to take you to the movement, staff, measure, note by clicking on it. > It would be nice to remove it by > default without having to tweak the lilypond source. yes, I've an idea there was some other reason to prefer the PDF generation via Print View->Print->print to file but I don't recall what it was now. > > >> Anyway, I can see that the main view in Denemo doesn't reflect the changes. > > By main view I guess you mean the Denemo display? That is never wysiwyg > > - so a rehearsal mark is just represented by the mark A, regardless of > > which one it is or which style will print. Of course, it would be > > possible to script it to display something else, and even (via the > > dynamic flag) to make them display A, B, C, refreshing at some scripted > > interval or on some condition such as adding a new rehearsal mark. I am > > guessing that is what you refer to below? > > > > yes, correct > > >> Even if I do a simple change in View>Lilypond, such as: > >> \set Score.markFormatter = #format-mark-box-numbers So if you like to do this you can create a version of the RehearsalMark command that issues that (probably for the whole score, a d-DirectivePut-score-prefix thing or some such) and then displays a number 1 in a square box. (And then contribute the script to Denemo's sources :) Richard > >> > >> The PDF is correct but Denemo keeps showing the letter > > the letter A that is? > >> instead of box > >> number. > > > > Richard > > > > > > _______________________________________________ Denemo-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel
