On Mon, 2012-08-20 at 23:16 -0500, Jeremiah Benham wrote: > On 08/18/2012 04:18 PM, Richard Shann wrote: > > On Sat, 2012-08-18 at 09:46 -0500, Jeremiah Benham wrote: > >> Things seem extremely broken in gub fur the static linux build. > > I didn't realize you were thinking of something that ambitious - > > building for linux with gub. > > What I had in mind was to build a static binary version of denemo, > (so > > the libraries like gtk, libevince ... would all be statically linked > to > > the denemo executable), while the user would have to install > LilyPond > > themselves. > > I imagined you doing this by creating a new target in the Makefile > with > > the link line using -Bstatic (working from memory of 10 years ago) > to > > get a statically linked binary. I imagine something may need to be > done > > I have been trying this. Unfortunately, I have tried with -static and > -Bstatic but each time `ldd denemo` returns a huge list of > dynamically > linked libraries. I read somewhere online that the library linked > needs > to be statically compiled itself in order to statically link it. I have dug around and you are quite right it seems: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1022120/do-i-need-static-libraries-to-statically-link
I presume that statically linked libraries are not readily available, and so this would take too much work... I still can't push to git - I have emailed savannah about it. I have several useful fixes pending. Richard _______________________________________________ Denemo-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel
