On Sat, 2012-08-18 at 09:46 -0500, Jeremiah Benham wrote: > Things seem extremely broken in gub fur the static linux build. I didn't realize you were thinking of something that ambitious - building for linux with gub. What I had in mind was to build a static binary version of denemo, (so the libraries like gtk, libevince ... would all be statically linked to the denemo executable), while the user would have to install LilyPond themselves. I imagined you doing this by creating a new target in the Makefile with the link line using -Bstatic (working from memory of 10 years ago) to get a statically linked binary. I imagine something may need to be done for Denemo to find the actions directory, the scheme initialization modules etc, I guess that's what binreloc is for. But the result should be something anyone with the same i386 based GNU/Linux machine could just put the files under their home directory and be able to run it without having root permissions.
Richard > Evince required a version of glibc that requires a linux kernal header > upgrade. Glibc also requires glibc-core this package I think is derived from > old glibc and is hosted on lilyponds website. Unfortunately, this glibc-core > only seemed to work with the old glibc. So it seems like a mess. > > I can create another windows build in a few days. > > I have created a fork of gub on github so that otherscan reproduce the > results of tge windows build. It might be missing a file or two but am not > sure what is missing. > > Jeremiah > > Richard Shann <[email protected]> wrote: > > >How are things going with the static linux thing? I have fixed the > >outstanding issues for Windows binary (AFAIK) so we are looking good for > >a release. > >Richard > > > >On Tue, 2012-08-07 at 13:10 -0500, Jeremiah Benham wrote: > >> The windows git snapshot works perfectly in wine. I can work toward > >> creating a static linux version in the next few days. > >> > >> Jeremiah > >> > >> Sent from my Samsung smartphone on AT&T > >> > >> Richard Shann <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> >On Tue, 2012-08-07 at 18:05 +0200, Federico Bruni wrote: > >> >> Il 07/08/2012 17:34, Richard Shann ha scritto: > >> >> > On Tue, 2012-08-07 at 13:09 +0200, Federico Bruni wrote: > >> >> >> Hi Denemo developers, > >> >> >> > >> >> >> I wonder what's the status of tablature support in Denemo. > >> >> >> Every now and then I try Denemo to check it but...as I've never used > >> >> >> it, > >> >> >> I'm not sure if I'm missing something. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> I'm using Denemo 0.9.2 on Debian testing. > >> >> >> I can see that I can input the music in a Staff and choose TabStaff > >> >> >> as > >> >> >> output. The PDF will contain only the TabStaff. > >> >> >> I don't know if this is a new feature or just the fact that I'm using > >> >> >> the lilypond mode. > >> >> > It's been in there for a while - 0.9.4 is pretty out of date - we have > >> >> > 0.9.6 ready. It tells LilyPond do print the staff as tab. If you want > >> >> > both the straightforward thing to do is to duplicate the staff I > >> >> > guess. > >> >> > That would be a bit crude though - if you edited one the other would > >> >> > need re-creating. > >> >> > >> >> No, too crude :) > >> >> > >> >> > With the upcoming release you could have a layout that printed the > >> >> > same > >> >> > music on two staffs one as tab the other as normal staff notation. > >> >> > (This > >> >> > is actually possible in 0.9.4 but you have to know LilyPond and > >> >> > create a > >> >> > custom scoreblock to do it in the View->LilyPond window - the score > >> >> > layout feature of 0.9.6 avoids you having to know the LilyPond to do > >> >> > this). > >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> LilyPond is not a problem (actually I love LilyPond "interface" and I'm > >> >> trying some frontend only for teaching purposes, as LilyPond is too > >> >> geeky for most of people). > >> >> > >> >> Good to know that 0.9.4 would support it somehow. > >> >hmm, I see I gave the impression this was new in 0.9.4, but actually you > >> >can do this sort of thing in versions going back much further. What is > >> >new in 0.9.6 is that you can have several different score layouts kept > >> >with your music, which don't need updating when you correct the music. > >> >And you can create many sorts of layouts without getting geeky with > >> >LilyPond. > >> >> My problem now is that I cannot compile Denemo without breaking other > >> >> programs. > >> >> I decided not to use 'apt-get build-dep denemo' because it wanted to > >> >> replace jack2 with jack. And I use some programs which depend on jack2: > >> >> ardour and stretchplayer, for example. > >> >> So I tried installing dependencies one by one, following the warnings > >> >> of > >> >> configure. And I had to stop when installing libfluidsynth-dev, because > >> >> again it wanted to replace jack2 with jack. > >> >> > >> >> I'm stuck here. > >> >> Unfortunately even Debian sid doesn't have 0.9.4 yet: > >> > > >> >I think that is probably my fault for not alerting the Debian packager > >> >about 0.9.4, partly because I knew 0.9.6 was coming hot on its heels. > >> >It sounds like this dependency problem is one between fluidsynth and > >> >jack? Not one we can do anything about in Denemo? I wonder if we should > >> >create a statically linked binary for GNU/Linux that people could try > >> >out, or use until the distros catch up... As it stands, folk running > >> >Windows are better off than those on GNU/Linux, which is bad for free > >> >software. > >> >If knowledgeable folk are listening in, please feel free to advise! > >> > > >> >Richard > >> > > >> > > >> >> http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=denemo&searchon=names&suite=all§ion=all > >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Obviously I'm looking for the normal workflow, such as in Tuxguitar > >> >> >> and > >> >> >> in lilypond: you write the music in the Staff and you see the notes > >> >> >> (well, the numbers) appearing automatically also in TabStaff. > >> >> > If you are thinking about what you see as you enter the music (rather > >> >> > than what is printed) then no, Denemo has no routines to display tab. > >> >> > >> >> I see, I guessed it > >> >> > >> >> > You would enter notes and Denemo would print the same notes on two > >> >> > staffs one tab and one normal. Or you could have a layout where they > >> >> > were printed out one after the other as separate pieces of music, if > >> >> > that is what you wanted. > >> >> > >> >> If 0.9.4 allows to enter music in one staff and make it appear in two > >> >> staves, it would be a good compromise. At least I could print > >> >> Staff+TabStaff, which is what I want. > >> >> > >> >> Unfortunately I can't test it now. > >> >> > >> >> > HTH > >> >> > Richard > >> >> > > >> >> >> Is it possible in Denemo? > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Thanks > >> >> >> > >> >> >> PS Link to the old manual is broken: > >> >> >> http://denemo.org/Manual > >> >> > > >> >> > hmm, where is the link? With the upcoming release you get tooltips > >> >> > almost everywhere... and the possibility of translating Denemo. > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> I mean, this page doesn't work: > >> >> http://old.denemo.org/doc/denemo-manual.html > >> >> > >> >> Tooltips are a good solution, sometimes they can almost replace > >> >> Documentation. > >> >> > >> >> Thanks! > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> >_______________________________________________ > >> >Denemo-devel mailing list > >> >[email protected] > >> >https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel > > > > _______________________________________________ Denemo-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel
