On Fri, 2019-02-01 at 15:30 -0800, rain wrote: > Although I am grateful for Denemo's sound output features, I find > that because of my lack of experience with being able to change > settings related to fluidsynth running on this Windows system, that I > can get a little bit better volume control by exporting the lilypond > (I copy and paste from lilypond output window, because 'export > lilypond' keeps reverting to a layout that is missing a few of the > staffs - but if I delete all the layouts, it will export correctly > one time, then revert to the broken layout again). > Then I open the code in Frescobaldi, which helps me to work with the > guts from a little different perspective (but composing in > Frescobaldi is a bit cumbersome for my taste) and I can send the midi > out to another program that works with soundfonts, with slightly > better volume control based on how the dynamic markings should > actually sound IMO, plus some of the articulations work, which I'm > unable to get working in Denemo for the life of me.
yes, Denemo's audio out has only been developed sufficiently for checking that the pitches and durations sound ok - it doesn't even do grace notes, which is one thing I would fix if I had time. It does have a a few other things which people have developed over the years, such as some dynamics, but for my use I had to add a switch to force full- volume output to prevent it distracting from listening for errors in the pitches/durations, which is what I use it for. Denemo can actually switch to using LilyPond's MIDI output - see Playback View, but it will be messy trying to control that further from inside Denemo - it is there for people wanting to play along to a scrolling properly typeset score. Richard _______________________________________________ Denemo-devel mailing list Denemo-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel
