+1 for Depot Version and Depot Update (without er) Marcus
> > Fancy names are sometimes catchy, and help identify the project, unless > there are too many of them. Usually a project should have only one fancy > name, but we have two: 'depot' and 'ruper'. > > Hence, why not make a single logo for 'Depot', and simply name the > artifacts "versioner" and "updater"? > > Hence it would be > > Depot versioner > Depot updater > > (or Depot Version and Depot Update) > > I think this would improve the clarity for outsiders and make the site, > docs, and code more understandable. In any case, we need to do it now, > before a first milestone release. > > WDOT? > > From me, +1 (please specify if you prefer the -er ending) > > -- > Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] > - verba volant, scripta manent - > (discussions get forgotten, just code remains) > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >
