"Jean T. Anderson" wrote:
> Daniel John Debrunner wrote: > > > Andrew McIntyre wrote: > > > > >I have updated the version number on the branch to 10.0.2.2 to > > >distinguish newer branch builds from the current release. The branch was > > >created as of svn revision 110050. > > > > So since the release was at svn revision 106978 and the branch at > > 110050, I think it means the commits listed below are in the 10.0 > > branch, but not in the release. Thus they would automatically be > > included in any future 10.0 release or snapshot. They all seem to be > > within the scope of a bug-fix/stable branch so I say "lazy approval" for > > including them in the 10.0 branch. > > ... > > This may be a dumb question, but why wouldn't the branch have been made > at 106979 ? Why have a gap between the release and the branch? > > -jean My guess is that between the time when release was made and branch was cut, there were checkins into other Apache projects and that is why the jump in the number.but I could be wrong. Mamta
