[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Daniel John Debrunner wrote: >> rather than a new error XJ074.S, the existing generic error XJ081.S >> (added by Shreyas) could have been used. > > > OK. Considering e.g. these existing codes (see below), it was not clear > to me what was the preferred way - adding a separate code or using a > generic one. > > String INVALID_FETCH_SIZE = "XJ062.S"; > String INVALID_MAX_ROWS_VALUE = "XJ063.S"; > String INVALID_FETCH_DIRECTION = "XJ064.S"; > String INVALID_ST_FETCH_SIZE = "XJ065.S"; > String INVALID_MAXFIELD_SIZE = "XJ066.S";
I think the discussion was that when Shreyas added a new similar message and ita was resolved that adding a generic message and that existing code could converge to its use over time. I can add a Jira entry for this. My "itch" is keeping the footprint down in whatever way possible. Dan.
