[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6527?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13995043#comment-13995043
 ] 

Dag H. Wanvik commented on DERBY-6527:
--------------------------------------

With deferrable constraints, there *will* be a difference between RESTRICT and 
NO ACTION, see the functional specification. So, separating the explanations 
for RESTRICT and NO ACTION will be good anyway, notwithstanding the Derby 
limitation mentioned above which essentially made the difference between the 
two action modes nil.

> Fix errors in foreign keys documentation
> ----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-6527
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6527
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Documentation
>    Affects Versions: 10.10.1.1
>            Reporter: Dag H. Wanvik
>            Assignee: Kim Haase
>         Attachments: DERBY-6527-2.diff, DERBY-6527.diff, rrefsqlj13590.html, 
> rrefsqlj13590.html
>
>
> Cf this email thread: 
> http://apache-database.10148.n7.nabble.com/Foreign-key-semantics-as-documented-td138227.html
> Our documentation in the reference manual on foreign keys/referential actions 
> has errors.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to