[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6638?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14044556#comment-14044556
]
Knut Anders Hatlen commented on DERBY-6638:
-------------------------------------------
At least when the javadoc tags are missing, the IDEs can detect it and warn us
about it so that we can fix it. :) If we add dummy javadoc tags, it will be
harder to find those occurrences.
> Remove unnecessary use of reflection in SignatureChecker
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DERBY-6638
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6638
> Project: Derby
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Tools
> Reporter: Dag H. Wanvik
> Attachments: derby-6638.diff, derby-6638.status
>
>
> Ca line 377 in SignatureChecker we use reflection to call
> DatabaseMetaData#getFunctionColumns. This is no longer necessary after we
> removed support for JDR 169.
> {color:blue}
> [Update:] There are more occurrences of reflection that can be removed in
> this class.
> {color}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
