Hi Øyvind,
Welcome back! Delighted to see you have not escaped our gravitational pull!
Personally, I don't have any strong feelings about this JIRA, but it is
grounded in the real customer experience of Dan Meany. For the record,
the relevant section of the SQL 2003 spec is Part 2, section 11.7.
Cheers,
-Rick
Oyvind Bakksjo wrote:
Hi folks, long time no see. :)
I think I'm ready to start doing some work on Derby again (not full
time, but more than zero time ;o). I was thinking of DERBY-653, which
Rick H created and then closed himself during a discussion in October.
I think it would be nice if Derby behaved correctly according to the
SQL standard here. I see allowing nulls with unique constraints as a
useful feature to have. So, considering that I've been absent for
quite a while, I don't know the state of the nation and have to ask:
Is this a feature the community would like to have? Does anyone object
to Derby behaving this way? And is anyone working on this right now,
considering working on it, or would like to?
--
Øyvind Bakksjø
