Oyvind Bakksjo wrote:
Hi folks, long time no see. :)
Hi Øyvind! Great to have you back
I think I'm ready to start doing some work on Derby again (not full time, but more than zero time ;o). I was thinking of DERBY-653, which Rick H created and then closed himself during a discussion in October. I think it would be nice if Derby behaved correctly according to the SQL standard here. I see allowing nulls with unique constraints as a useful feature to have. So, considering that I've been absent for quite a while, I don't know the state of the nation and have to ask: Is this a feature the community would like to have? Does anyone object to Derby behaving this way? And is anyone working on this right now, considering working on it, or would like to?
I think this is a useful feature. I do not know of anyone who is working on this issue.
Andreas
-- Øyvind Bakksjø
