[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2914?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12536030
]
Kim Haase commented on DERBY-2914:
----------------------------------
I know this is a bit late, but one line of rrefgetuseraccess.dita still refers
to this function as a procedure: "The value that is returned by this procedure
is either ..."
I realize this is outside the scope of the issue, but the first sentence of
this topic has a subject-verb agreement problem: "the current connection access
permissions that is for the user specified..." Can a user have more than one
permission? The SET version sets only one, so maybe it should be "permission".
Also, "that is" could just be removed, if you feel like it.
The rrefsetuseraccess.dita topic is just fine.
> new stored procedures, SYSCS_UTIL.SYSCS_SET_USER_ACCESS,
> SYSCS_UTIL.SYSCS_GET_USER_ACCESS, SYSCS_UTIL.SYSCS_EMPTY_STATEMENT_CACHE()
> should get documented
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DERBY-2914
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2914
> Project: Derby
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Documentation
> Affects Versions: 10.3.1.4, 10.4.0.0
> Reporter: Myrna van Lunteren
> Assignee: Laura Stewart
> Fix For: 10.3.1.5, 10.3.2.0, 10.4.0.0
>
> Attachments: derby2914_1.diff, derby2914_2.diff,
> rrefemptystmtcache.html, rrefemptystmtcache.html, rrefgetuseraccess.html,
> rrefgetuseraccess.html, rrefgetuseraccess.html, rrefsetuseraccess.html,
> rrefsetuseraccess.html, rrefsetuseraccess.html
>
>
> With DERBY-2772 and DERBY-2735 3 new procedures
> SYSCS_UTIL.SYSCS_SET_USER_ACCESS, SYSCS_UTIL.SYSCS_GET_USER_ACCESS and
> SYSCS_UTIL.SYSCS_EMPTY_STATEMENT_CACHE()
> were created; they need to be documented in the reference manual.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
