[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2914?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12537105
]
Kim Haase commented on DERBY-2914:
----------------------------------
I have obviously lost all credibility by now, but I notice that the
getuseraccess file still has the extra verbiage that was removed from the
setuseraccess file -- the first sentence says "permission that is for the user
specified" instead of just "permission for the user specified." I don't know if
this is important enough to bother about.
> new stored procedures, SYSCS_UTIL.SYSCS_SET_USER_ACCESS,
> SYSCS_UTIL.SYSCS_GET_USER_ACCESS, SYSCS_UTIL.SYSCS_EMPTY_STATEMENT_CACHE()
> should get documented
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DERBY-2914
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2914
> Project: Derby
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Documentation
> Affects Versions: 10.3.1.4, 10.4.0.0
> Reporter: Myrna van Lunteren
> Assignee: Laura Stewart
> Fix For: 10.3.1.4
>
> Attachments: derby2914_1.diff, derby2914_2.diff, derby2914_3.diff,
> derby2914_4.diff, derby2914_5.diff, index.html, rrefemptystmtcache.html,
> rrefemptystmtcache.html, rrefgetuseraccess.html, rrefgetuseraccess.html,
> rrefgetuseraccess.html, rrefgetuseraccess.html, rrefgetuseraccess.html,
> rrefsetuseraccess.html, rrefsetuseraccess.html, rrefsetuseraccess.html,
> rrefsetuseraccess.html, rrefsetuseraccess.html
>
>
> With DERBY-2772 and DERBY-2735 3 new procedures
> SYSCS_UTIL.SYSCS_SET_USER_ACCESS, SYSCS_UTIL.SYSCS_GET_USER_ACCESS and
> SYSCS_UTIL.SYSCS_EMPTY_STATEMENT_CACHE()
> were created; they need to be documented in the reference manual.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
