[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-3149?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12543890
]
Olav Sandstaa commented on DERBY-3149:
--------------------------------------
One question about the ant junit-pptesting target: why do we have to include
junit.jar explicitly in the CLASSPATH in order for this target to find
junit.jar while the ant pptesting target is able to locate the junit.jar in the
tools/java directory? Couldn't also the junit-pptesting target use the
tools/java/junit.jar file?
> Add ant targets for building and running the package private tests against
> the classes directories
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DERBY-3149
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-3149
> Project: Derby
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: Build tools, Test
> Affects Versions: 10.4.0.0
> Reporter: Kristian Waagan
> Assignee: Kristian Waagan
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 10.4.0.0
>
> Attachments: derby-3149-1a.diff, derby-3149-1a.stat,
> derby-3149-1b.diff, derby-3149-2a-conditional_compilation_fix.diff,
> derby-3149-2b-conditional_compilation_fix.diff
>
>
> Create ant targets in build.xml to compile and run the package private tests.
> The first step will be to run the tests against the classes directories.
> Implementing a solution that runs against jars is not technically difficult,
> it just brings a host of decisions to be taken... Maybe even more important,
> does running against the jars add any value?
> The compile will be included in the 'all' target to test the implementation.
> Feel free to post your concerns if you think building the package private
> tests should be a manual action only.
> The tests will also be run as part of junit-all / junitreport.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
