On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 6:17 AM, Rick Hillegas <[email protected]> wrote: > Knut Anders Hatlen wrote: >> >> Rick Hillegas <[email protected]> writes: >> >> >>> >>> Thanks, Knut! I notice that you have removed [DERBY-2991] from the >>> 10.5.1 release-planning page. Does that mean you are concerned that it >>> will not make it onto the 10.5 release train? >>> >> >> No, I removed it from the list of new features because I considered it a >> bug fix, not a feature. It's still mentioned if you follow the >> HighValueFixCandidates link in the 10.5.1 Bug Fixing section. Feel free >> to add it back if you think it belongs in the feature list or in some >> other section of the planning page. >> >> > > Thanks for the explanation, Knut. I think that it's an important fix which a > lot of users will be keenly interested in. So I hope that it is highlighted > in the release notes. I'll leave it to our release manager, Myrna, to decide > how she wants to flag important fixes like this. > > Thanks, > -Rick >
I think I agree that this is a bug fix, not a feature... It's a good point though - shouldn't this bug fix get marked as needing a release note? Or am I misunderstanding and there is no impact to existing applications? Myrna
