[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-866?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13116906#comment-13116906
 ] 

Dag H. Wanvik commented on DERBY-866:
-------------------------------------

Thanks for pushing this forward, Rick! Some questions and comments:

- q1: the password in the system table is the result of the hash, right? (not 
the password itself)
- q2: salting?
- q3: should the system table be encrypted to avoid attacks? currently we 
encrypt entire database which may not be what one wants(?)
- q4: boot-strap: how is the dbo user created? Autmatically when sing the 
provided connection password when creating the database and seeing the property 
for the new scheme set in derby.authentication.provider?
- q5: database only properties is not default, but must be enabled. will the 
new mechanism work without it? (cf. derby.database.propertiesOnly)
  If so, the authentication could be overridden by specifying another value for 
derby.authentication.provider.
- q6: do you see the scheme requiring SQL authorization enabled? If not, we'd 
need encryption to avoid attacks: arbitrary user could backup entire database 
and stage dictionary attack against the USER table...Btw, I forget, *is* backup 
restricted with authorization on? Docs doesn't say...
- comment: creating a new user/role should cross-check each other to avoid 
collisions in uids.
- comment: the new feature only solves the issue of database level 
authentication, not system level, obviously (limitation) 
                
> Derby User Management Enhancements
> ----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-866
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-866
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Services
>    Affects Versions: 10.2.1.6
>            Reporter: Francois Orsini
>         Attachments: Derby_User_Enhancement.html, 
> Derby_User_Enhancement_v1.1.html
>
>
> Proposal to enhance Derby's Built-In DDL User Management. (See proposal spec 
> attached to the JIRA).
> Abstract:
> This feature aims at improving the way BUILT-IN users are managed in Derby by 
> providing a more intuitive and familiar DDL interface. Currently (in 
> 10.1.2.1), Built-In users can be defined at the system and/or database level. 
> Users created at the system level can be defined via JVM or/and Derby system 
> properties in the derby.properties file. Built-in users created at the 
> database level are defined via a call to a Derby system procedure 
> (SYSCS_UTIL.SYSCS_SET_DATABASE_PROPERTY) which sets a database property.
> Defining a user at the system level is very convenient and practical during 
> the development phase (EOD) of an application - However, the user's password 
> is not encrypted and consequently appears in clear in the derby.properties 
> file. Hence, for an application going into production, whether it is embedded 
> or not, it is preferable to create users at the database level where the 
> password is encrypted.
> There is no real ANSI SQL standard for managing users in SQL but by providing 
> a more intuitive and known interface, it will ease Built-In User management 
> at the database level as well as Derby's adoption.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to