[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-5488?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13140471#comment-13140471
 ] 

Rick Hillegas commented on DERBY-5488:
--------------------------------------

Hi Kristian,

Can you clarify what portability issues you are concerned about? It seems to me 
that octets are only applicable to languages (like C) which represent strings 
as arrays of 8-bit bytes.

Thanks,
-Rick
                
> Add remaining JDBC 4.1 bits which did not appear in the Java 7 javadoc.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-5488
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-5488
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: JDBC, SQL
>    Affects Versions: 10.9.0.0
>            Reporter: Rick Hillegas
>         Attachments: JDBC_4.1_Supplement.html
>
>
> In addition to the JDBC 4.1 bits which were visible in the Java 7 javadoc, a 
> couple other items appear in the JDBC 4.1 Maintenance Review spec. This spec 
> has been published on the JCP website at 
> http://download.oracle.com/otndocs/jcp/jdbc-4_1-mrel-eval-spec/index.html. I 
> will attach a functional spec for the remaining bits.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to