[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-5488?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13142270#comment-13142270
 ] 

Rick Hillegas commented on DERBY-5488:
--------------------------------------

Thanks for taking a look at the patch, Knut. I think I will check it in as is 
and then we can sand down the behavior of setObject( BigInteger ) in a 
follow-on patch. I will post some thoughts after consulting the experts.

                
> Add remaining JDBC 4.1 bits which did not appear in the Java 7 javadoc.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-5488
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-5488
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: JDBC, SQL
>    Affects Versions: 10.9.0.0
>            Reporter: Rick Hillegas
>            Assignee: Rick Hillegas
>         Attachments: JDBC_4.1_Supplement.html, 
> derby-5488-01-aa-objectMappingAndConversion.diff
>
>
> In addition to the JDBC 4.1 bits which were visible in the Java 7 javadoc, a 
> couple other items appear in the JDBC 4.1 Maintenance Review spec. This spec 
> has been published on the JCP website at 
> http://download.oracle.com/otndocs/jcp/jdbc-4_1-mrel-eval-spec/index.html. I 
> will attach a functional spec for the remaining bits.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to