[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-5488?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13142044#comment-13142044
]
Knut Anders Hatlen commented on DERBY-5488:
-------------------------------------------
+ } else if (source instanceof java.math.BigInteger) {
+ return setObject(targetType, ((java.math.BigInteger)
source).longValue() );
+ } else if (x instanceof java.math.BigInteger) {
+ setLong(parameterIndex, ((java.math.BigInteger)
x).longValue() );
What if the BigInteger contains a number greater than Long.MAX_VALUE or less
than Long.MIN_VALUE? Should we convert it to a BigDecimal instead of a Long in
that case?
> Add remaining JDBC 4.1 bits which did not appear in the Java 7 javadoc.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DERBY-5488
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-5488
> Project: Derby
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: JDBC, SQL
> Affects Versions: 10.9.0.0
> Reporter: Rick Hillegas
> Assignee: Rick Hillegas
> Attachments: JDBC_4.1_Supplement.html,
> derby-5488-01-aa-objectMappingAndConversion.diff
>
>
> In addition to the JDBC 4.1 bits which were visible in the Java 7 javadoc, a
> couple other items appear in the JDBC 4.1 Maintenance Review spec. This spec
> has been published on the JCP website at
> http://download.oracle.com/otndocs/jcp/jdbc-4_1-mrel-eval-spec/index.html. I
> will attach a functional spec for the remaining bits.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
