On 3/5/2012 11:50 AM, Katherine Marsden wrote:
I want to ask for the community help to review these two lists. For
the issues you fixed, if a fix does not seem appropriate for backport,
Please label it with the label(s) derby_backport_reject_10_8 and/or
derby_backport_reject_10_5 as appropriate.
FYI If you haven't already done this, to look at just your own issues
while you are logged into Jira you can use the links below. Once you
label them derby_backport_reject_xx_xx then they automatically come of
the list. Rick took the approach of putting a comment in the ones that
looked good for backport and to which I think is good so we know they've
been looked at.
10.8 candidates for assignee = currentUser()
original assignees Dag and Bryan
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&jqlQuery=project+%3D+DERBY+and+type+%3D+Bug+and++labels+not+in+%28derby_backport_reject_10_8%29+and+resolution+%3D+fixed+and+fixVersion+in+%28%2210.9.0.0%22%29+and+fixVersion+not+in+%28%2210.8.1.2%22%2C+%2210.8.2.2%22%2C%2210.8.2.3%22%29+and+assignee+%3D+currentUser%28%29
additional 10.5 candidates for assignee = currentUser()
original assignees Dag, Mamta, Siddarth, Kristian, Houx, Mike, Knut Anders,
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&jqlQuery=project+%3D+DERBY+and+type+%3D+Bug+and++labels+not+in+%28derby_backport_reject_10_8%2Cderby_backport_reject_10_7%2C+derby_backport_reject_10_6%2C+derby_backport_reject_10_5%29+and+resolution+%3D+fixed+and+fixVersion+in+%28%2210.8.1.2%22%2C+%2210.8.2.2%22%2C%2210.8.2.3%22%29+and+fixVersion+not+in+%28%2210.5.1.1%22%2C%2210.5.2.0%22%2C+%2210.5.3.0%22%2C+%2210.5.3.1%22%2C+%2210.5.3.2%22%29+and+affectedVersion+in+%28%2210.5.1.1%22%2C%2210.5.2.0%22%2C+%2210.5.3.0%22%2C+%2210.5.3.1%22%2C+%2210.5.3.2%22%29+and+assignee+%3D+currentUser%28%29
Then based on everyone's input I will open up a backporting issue with
the issues linked on Thursday.
Please also let me know if there are issues that maybe missed these
queries for some reason such as affects version not including 10.5. I
reviewed the ones that were fixed in 10.8 but not marked as
regressions, but it is entirely possible I missed some.
