Kathey, when I run the 10.5 query, it says no matching issues found.
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 10:24 AM, Katherine Marsden <[email protected]> wrote: > On 3/5/2012 11:50 AM, Katherine Marsden wrote: >> >> >> I want to ask for the community help to review these two lists. For the >> issues you fixed, if a fix does not seem appropriate for backport, Please >> label it with the label(s) derby_backport_reject_10_8 and/or >> derby_backport_reject_10_5 as appropriate. > > > FYI If you haven't already done this, to look at just your own issues > while you are logged into Jira you can use the links below. Once you label > them derby_backport_reject_xx_xx then they automatically come of the list. > Rick took the approach of putting a comment in the ones that looked good for > backport and to which I think is good so we know they've been looked at. > > 10.8 candidates for assignee = currentUser() > original assignees Dag and Bryan > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&jqlQuery=project+%3D+DERBY+and+type+%3D+Bug+and++labels+not+in+%28derby_backport_reject_10_8%29+and+resolution+%3D+fixed+and+fixVersion+in+%28%2210.9.0.0%22%29+and+fixVersion+not+in+%28%2210.8.1.2%22%2C+%2210.8.2.2%22%2C%2210.8.2.3%22%29+and+assignee+%3D+currentUser%28%29 > > > additional 10.5 candidates for assignee = currentUser() > original assignees Dag, Mamta, Siddarth, Kristian, Houx, Mike, Knut Anders, > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&jqlQuery=project+%3D+DERBY+and+type+%3D+Bug+and++labels+not+in+%28derby_backport_reject_10_8%2Cderby_backport_reject_10_7%2C+derby_backport_reject_10_6%2C+derby_backport_reject_10_5%29+and+resolution+%3D+fixed+and+fixVersion+in+%28%2210.8.1.2%22%2C+%2210.8.2.2%22%2C%2210.8.2.3%22%29+and+fixVersion+not+in+%28%2210.5.1.1%22%2C%2210.5.2.0%22%2C+%2210.5.3.0%22%2C+%2210.5.3.1%22%2C+%2210.5.3.2%22%29+and+affectedVersion+in+%28%2210.5.1.1%22%2C%2210.5.2.0%22%2C+%2210.5.3.0%22%2C+%2210.5.3.1%22%2C+%2210.5.3.2%22%29+and+assignee+%3D+currentUser%28%29 > > > >> Then based on everyone's input I will open up a backporting issue with the >> issues linked on Thursday. >> >> Please also let me know if there are issues that maybe missed these >> queries for some reason such as affects version not including 10.5. I >> reviewed the ones that were fixed in 10.8 but not marked as regressions, but >> it is entirely possible I missed some. >> >
